Architects Use GridGain to Accelerate and Scale-Out Applications
Enterprise architects need to speed up and scale out new or existing enterprise applications to drive new digital initiatives. Digital transformation requires a new generation of business applications that ingest, process and analyze data in real-time to drive optimal user experiences. With GridGain, you can create modern, flexible applications built on an in-memory computing platform that can scale with your business needs.
GridGain In-Memory Computing Solutions
GridGain offers enterprise architects the in-memory computing platform software, support, and professional services they need to better achieve real-time digital business goals. The GridGain in-memory computing platform easily integrates with new or existing applications and provides real-time performance and massive scalability.
Built on the open source Apache Ignite project, GridGain is a cost-effective solution for accelerating and massively scaling out new or existing applications, with features and abilities that span a wide variety of use cases and industries.
How GridGain Helps Enterprise Architects
For existing applications, GridGain is typically used as an in-memory data grid between the application and data layer, with no rip-and-replace of the underlying database. For new applications, GridGain is used as an in-memory data grid or an in-memory database. A unified API, including ANSI-99 SQL and ACID transaction support, provides easy integration with existing applications and databases. GridGain can be deployed anywhere including on-premises, on a public or private cloud, or in a hybrid environment.
Learn About GridGain In-Memory Computing Solutions for Enterprise Architects
The white papers, webinars, application notes, product comparisons, and videos below discuss use case considerations from an architectural standpoint.
Spread betting offers some compelling advantages, including low entry and transaction costs, preferential tax treatment, and a diverse array of products and options. Traders can bet on any type of event for which there is a measurable outcome that might go in either of two directions – for example, housing prices, the value of a stock-market index, or the difference in the scores of two teams in a sporting event.
This white paper discusses how to accelerate Apache® Cassandra™ and improve Cassandra performance. Apache Cassandra is a popular NoSQL database that does certain things incredibly well. It can be always available, with multi-datacenter replication. It is also scalable and lets users keep their data anywhere. However, Cassandra is lacking in a few key areas – particularly speed. Because it stores data on disk, Cassandra is not fast enough for some of today’s extreme OLTP workloads.
To take full advantage of an in-memory platform, it’s often not enough to upload your data into a cluster and start querying it with key-value or SQL APIs. You need to distribute the data efficiently and tap into distributed computations that minimize data movement over the network.
In this webinar, you’ll see how to design and execute distributed computations considering all the pros and cons. In particular, the following will be covered:
Apache Ignite is a powerful in-memory computing platform. The Apache IgniteSink streaming connector enables users to inject Flink data into the Ignite cache. Join Saikat Maitra to learn how to build a simple data streaming application using Apache Flink and Apache Ignite. This stream processing topology will allow data streaming in a distributed, scalable, and fault-tolerant manner, which can process data sets consisting of virtually unlimited streams of events.
Most enterprises have PostgreSQL deployments that they will be using for years to come for transactional, big data, mobile, and IoT use cases. How can Postgres continue to support the current and emerging use cases which demand ever higher performance and more scalability into the future? In this webinar we will discuss methods to accelerate and scale out this highly popular database including caching, sharding, and in-memory data grids such as Apache® Ignite™.
Learn some of the best practices and the different options for maximizing availability and preventing data loss. This session explains in detail the various challenges including cluster and data center failures, and the best practices for implementing disaster recovery (DR) for distributed in-memory computing based on real-world deployments. Topics include:
This webinar discusses deploying Apache Ignite into production in public and private clouds. Companies have faced many challenges when deploying in-memory computing platforms such as Apache Ignite in the cloud, but they have also discovered many best practices that have made success possible.
This product comparison describes the advantages and benefits of migrating from DataSynapse to GridGain as an in-memory computing solution to power mission-critical and data-intensive applications.
This in-depth feature comparison shows how the most current versions of GridGain Professional Edition, Enterprise Edition, Ultimate Edition and Redis Enterprise (and their respective open source projects where relevant) compare in 25 categories.
This in-depth feature comparison shows how the most current versions of GridGain Professional Edition, Enterprise Edition, Ultimate Edition and Hazelcast (and their respective open source projects where relevant) compare in 25 different categories.
This in-depth feature comparison shows how the most current versions of GridGain Professional Edition, Enterprise Edition, Ultimate Edition and Oracle Coherence (and their respective open source projects where relevant) compare in 25 different categories.
Over the last decade, the 10x growth of transaction volumes, 50x growth in data volumes, and drive for real-time response and analytics has pushed relational databases beyond their limits. Scaling an existing RDBMS vertically with hardware is expensive and limited. Moving to NoSQL requires new skills and major changes to applications. Ripping out the existing RDBMS and replacing it with another RDBMS with a lower TCO is still risky.